Singh v. Christian et al
Plaintiff: Nirmal Singh
Defendant: Gregory W Christian, Emilio T Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and Robert S Mueller, III
Case Number: 2:2007cv01151
Filed: July 23, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: King
Presiding Judge: Robert S. Lasnik
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court GRANTS Mr. Singh's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 67 ) and DENIES USCIS's motion (Dkt. # 66 ). The court vacates USCIS's October 2009 decision denying Mr. Singh's motion for adjustment of status. This matter is dismissed, and the court remands this matter to USCIS for a new adjudication of Mr. Singh's application in accordance with this order. (CL)
April 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER denying 54 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 57 Motion for Discovery by Judge Richard A Jones. Counsel are directed to meet and confer as ordered to address supplement to administrative record. (JJ)
April 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MINUTE ORDER; The Court directs the parties to meet and confer and provide a joint status report by May 8, 2009 to address the questions provided in this minute order, by Judge Richard A Jones. (VP)
July 23, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEVER AND SEVERING CASES; plaintiffs' claims originally filed under case C07-339RSL are severed and plaintiff Nirmal Singh shall be named in a new case C07-1151RSLby Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (RS, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Singh v. Christian et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nirmal Singh
Represented By: Hilary Han
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory W Christian
Represented By: Kristin Berger Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Emilio T Gonzalez
Represented By: Kristin Berger Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Chertoff
Represented By: Kristin Berger Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert S Mueller, III
Represented By: Kristin Berger Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?