Singh v. Christian et al
Nirmal Singh |
Gregory W Christian, Emilio T Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and Robert S Mueller, III |
2:2007cv01151 |
July 23, 2007 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
Robert S. Lasnik |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 75 ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court GRANTS Mr. Singh's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 67 ) and DENIES USCIS's motion (Dkt. # 66 ). The court vacates USCIS's October 2009 decision denying Mr. Singh's motion for adjustment of status. This matter is dismissed, and the court remands this matter to USCIS for a new adjudication of Mr. Singh's application in accordance with this order. (CL) |
Filing 62 ORDER denying 54 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 57 Motion for Discovery by Judge Richard A Jones. Counsel are directed to meet and confer as ordered to address supplement to administrative record. (JJ) |
Filing 41 MINUTE ORDER; The Court directs the parties to meet and confer and provide a joint status report by May 8, 2009 to address the questions provided in this minute order, by Judge Richard A Jones. (VP) |
Filing 2 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEVER AND SEVERING CASES; plaintiffs' claims originally filed under case C07-339RSL are severed and plaintiff Nirmal Singh shall be named in a new case C07-1151RSLby Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (RS, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.