Northwest Coalition For Alternatives To Pesticides et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service
Northwest Coalition For Alternatives To Pesticides, Pacific Coast Federation of Fisherman's Associations and Institute for Fisheries Resources |
National Marine Fisheries Service |
2:2007cv01791 |
November 5, 2007 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
XX US, Outside District |
Robert S. Lasnik |
Environmental Matters |
16 U.S.C. ยง 1538 Endangered Species Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 82 ORDER re Defendant's 81 Third Unopposed Motion to Amend: It is HEREBY ORDERED that paragraph 4 of the Court's May 21, 2014 Stipulation and Order to Amend the Stipulated Settlement Agreement Affirmed by this Court on August 1, 2008 (Dkt. 50 ) is amended to read: "4. NMFS agrees to finalize and publish a biological opinion concerning the effects of 1, 3-D and racemic metolachlor by June 30, 2021." Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH) |
Filing 80 ORDER re Defendant's 73 Motion to Amend, Plaintiffs' 74 Cross Motion to Amend: Paragraph 3 of the Court's order amending the Stipulated Settlement Agreement (Dkt. # 50 at 6) is hereby amended to read, "NMFS shall finalize and publicize a biological opinion concerning the effects of Bromoxynil and Prometryn by October 31, 2021." Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.