Zhang v. Boeing Company et al
Plaintiff Liaosheng Zhang alleges that Defendants Boeing Company, Amazon Global Resources, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation never hired him. Plaintiff contends that Defendants prefers to hire H1B foreign workers who are much younger and present less medical liabilities to the companies, even though Plaintiff is a qualified U.S. worker.
| Liaosheng Zhang |
| Boeing Company, Amazon Global Resources Inc and Microsoft Corporation |
| 2:2007cv01794 |
| November 5, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Richard A Jones |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
|
Filing
9
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Defendant Boeing Company re 8 Answer to Complaint (Amended) With Jury Demand. (Petersen, Chelsea)
|
|
Filing
8
ANSWER to Complaint Boeing's Answer to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint with JURY DEMAND by Boeing Company.(Petersen, Chelsea)
|
Filing
7
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENT. FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 2/14/2008, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 2/21/2008, Joint Status Report deadline is 2/28/2008, by Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE)
|
|
Filing
5
NOTICE re Pltf's Vacation filed by Plaintiff Liaosheng Zhang. (CL, )
|
|
Filing
3
WAIVER OF SERVICE of summons upon defendant Boeing Company mailed on 11/20/2007 (Petersen, Chelsea)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
