National Union Fire Insurance Company v. Greenwich Insurance Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Washington Western District National Union Fire Insurance Company v. Greenwich Insurance Company

National Union Fire Insurance Company v. Greenwich Insurance Company

Plaintiff:	National Union Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:	Greenwich Insurance Company
Case Number:	2:2007cv02065
Filed:	December 21, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office:	Seattle Office
County:	King
Presiding Judge:	John C Coughenour
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 22, 2009	Filing 78 ORDER by Judge John C. Coughenour. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 68 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 67 ) is GRANTED. The following motions are now moot: Plain tiff's Motion to Disqualify Defendant's Counsel (Dkt. No. 27 ), Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Subpoenas (Dkt. No. 51 ), Plaintiff's Motions in Limine (Dkt. Nos. 46 & 54 ), Defendant's Motions in Limine (Dkt. No. 48 ), and Defendant's Motion to Compel Trial Attendance (Dkt. No. 49 ). The parties are directed to meet and confer within ten calendar days of this Order and provide the Court with a joint status report on whether a trial is still necessary.(CL)
February 2, 2009	Filing 64 ORDER denying Dft's 25 Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Bad Faith; denying Dft's 26 Motion for Summary Judgment on Contractual Duties; granting Pltf's 29 Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge John C Coughenour.(RS)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 22, 2009

Filing 78 ORDER by Judge John C. Coughenour. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 68 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 67 ) is GRANTED. The following motions are now moot: Plain tiff's Motion to Disqualify Defendant's Counsel (Dkt. No. 27 ), Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Subpoenas (Dkt. No. 51 ), Plaintiff's Motions in Limine (Dkt. Nos. 46 & 54 ), Defendant's Motions in Limine (Dkt. No. 48 ), and Defendant's Motion to Compel Trial Attendance (Dkt. No. 49 ). The parties are directed to meet and confer within ten calendar days of this Order and provide the Court with a joint status report on whether a trial is still necessary.(CL)

February 2, 2009

Filing 64 ORDER denying Dft's 25 Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Bad Faith; denying Dft's 26 Motion for Summary Judgment on Contractual Duties; granting Pltf's 29 Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge John C Coughenour.(RS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: National Union Fire Insurance Company v. Greenwich Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: National Union Fire Insurance Company
Represented By:	Stephen G Skinner
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Greenwich Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?