Rodolf v. Kieland, et al
| Richard Charles Rodolf |
| Micic Dragic, Richard Connelly, David Mann, Christopher Kieland and Gregory T. Martinez |
| 2:2008cv00475 |
| March 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Thomas S. Zilly |
| Mary Alice Theiler |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 85 Defendants' Second Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Richard Connelly and Micic Dragic are hereby dismissed with prejudice, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MD)
|
|
Filing
81
STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. Discovery ddl is extended to December 23, 2009 for the sole purpose of taking the deposition of testimony of dft Dragic Micic.(CL)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER REFERRING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL TO PRO BONO PANEL ; request/motion noted for 7/10/09; pltf's motion to subpoena medical records held in abeyance by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. cc R Rodolf, S Haas (RS)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER denying plaintiff's 48 Motion to supplement; JSR order is vacated by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS) cc R Rodolf
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER CONTINUING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SUBPOENA MEDICAL RECORDS granting plaintiff's 54 Motion to postpone motion to subpoena ; plaintiff's 51 MOTION to subpoena medical records is renoted for 6/5/09 by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.cc R Rodolf (RS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
