Southridge Partnership v. Aspen Specialty Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Southridge Partnership
Defendant: Aspen Specialty Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2008cv00931
Filed: June 13, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Insurance Office
County: King
Presiding Judge: John C Coughenour
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Notice of Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER denying pltf's 22 and 23 Motions for Partial Summary Judgment. Additionally, the Court declines to impose sanctions on Pltf for filing the instant motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927, by Judge John C Coughenour.(VP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Southridge Partnership v. Aspen Specialty Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Southridge Partnership
Represented By: Michael Thomas Watkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aspen Specialty Insurance Company
Represented By: Mark S Cole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?