Williams v. Palmquist et al
| George Williams, Jr. |
| Robert J. Palmquist, Munez and All Members and Agents of FDC S.O.R.T. Team |
| 2:2008cv01180 |
| August 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| King |
| James P. Donohue |
| Richard A Jones |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The Court adopts the 92 Report and Recommendation. Defendant Katherine Skillestad Winans' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 88 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's amended complaint (Dkt. No. 8 ), and this action, are DISMISSED withn prejudice as to all remaining claims. (cc: pltf) (CL)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones.The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART 61 Dft's Motion for Summary Judgment. (cc: pltf.)(CL)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 24 ) is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff's claim of inadequate medical care, and DENIED with respect to all other claims asserted by plaintiff in his amended complaint. Defendants are directed to file an answer to plaintiff's amended complaint within twenty (20) days of the date on which this Order is entered. (cc: pltf G. Williams, Jr.)(CL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
