RSUI Indemnity Company Inc v. Vision One LLC et al
RSUI Indemnity Company Inc |
Vision One LLC and Berg Equipment & Scaffolding Co Inc |
2:2008cv01386 |
September 16, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
XX US, Outside District |
Robert S. Lasnik |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 152 ORDER granting in part and denying in part dfts' 123 Motion for summary judgment by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS) |
Filing 137 ORDER FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW re 102 Agreed Stipulated MOTION and Proposed Order for in Camera Review or, in the Alternative, for Expedited Briefing Schedule filed by RSUI Indemnity Company Inc, Mullin Law Group; Mullin to produce documents to Chambers within 10 days by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (RS) |
Filing 132 ORDER denying 89 MOTION for Clarification re Order Granting Partial Summary Judgment re Coverage re 81 Order on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed by RSUI Indemnity Company Inc by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (RS) |
Filing 120 ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. The Court GRANTS plaintiff's motion to stay (Dkt. # 86 ). All deadlines in this matter are hereby vacated. (CL) |
Filing 84 ORDER granting in part and denying in part pltf's 26 Motion to Compel and Mullin's Motion for protective order by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.