Phillips v. Noonan et al
| Joseph Phillips |
| Noonan and Sharron |
| 2:2008cv01541 |
| October 20, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| XX US, Outside District |
| John C Coughenour |
| Mary Alice Theiler |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER DISMISSING & 1983 ACTION by Judge John C Coughenour. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation; Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 36 ) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint and this action are DISMISSED with prejudice, Plaintiff's Motion to Issue Subpoenas (Dkt. No. 43 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. (cc: pltf J. Phillips). (CL)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER striking plaintiff's 39 Motion to Produce. A COPY OF THIS ORDER HAS BEEN MAILED TO PLAINTIFF TODAY. Signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler.(GB)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting defendants' 34 Motion for Extension of Time. A COPY OF THIS ORDER HAS BEEN MAILED TO PLAINTIFF TODAY. Signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler.(GB)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER denying plaintiff's 30 2nd Motion to Appoint Counsel. A COPY OF THIS ORDER HAS BEEN MAILED TO PLAINTIFF TODAY. Signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler.(GB)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER denying plaintiff's 22 Motion to Appoint Counsel. A COPY OF THIS ORDER HAS BEEN MAILED TO PLAINTIFF TODAY. Signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler.(GB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
