Powell v. American President Lines Ltd et al
Michael S Powell |
American President Lines Ltd, APL Maritime Ltd, Stephen L Bertrand, Jane Doe Bertrand and APL Singapore M/V |
2:2008cv01606 |
November 3, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Marine Office |
Grays Harbor |
Marsha J. Pechman |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
46:688 Jones Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 69 ORDER denying 63 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 64 Motion to Reopen Case; signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(SC) |
Filing 65 ORDER granting 61 Motion for Bill of Costs in the amount of $ 2,281.55 $2,821.55 against Plaintiff Michael S. Powell. by Clerk Bruce Rifkin.(BR) Modified on 1/14/2010 -mailed copy of order to Michael Powell(MD). Modified on 1/19/2010 - made correction to docket text re: amount(MD). |
Filing 60 JUDGMENT in favor of APL Marine Services, Ltd, APL Maritime Ltd, APL Singapore M/V, American President Lines Ltd, Stephen L Bertrand against Michael S Powell; all claims against Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice; signed by Docket Clerk M Duett at the direction of Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SC) |
Filing 45 ORDER denying 34 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(SC) |
Filing 24 ORDER on 15 Laura Bertrand's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court orders that the claims against her are DISMISSED with prejudice. Jane Doe Bertrand terminated, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(MD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.