Atanda v. Clark
Petitioner: Aderemi Emmanuel Atanda
Respondent: A Neil Clark
Case Number: 2:2009cv00157
Filed: February 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: King
Presiding Judge: James P. Donohue
Presiding Judge: Robert S. Lasnik
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 29 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE/DECISON BY COURT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED; The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Dkt. 6 , is DENIED, respondent's motion to dismiss, Dkt. 14 , is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. (cc: petitioner A. Atanda) (CL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Atanda v. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Aderemi Emmanuel Atanda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: A Neil Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?