Krottner v. Starbucks Corporation Featured Case
Plaintiff: Laura Krottner
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Case Number: 2:2009cv00216
Filed: February 19, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Labor: Other Office
County: XX US, Outside District
Presiding Judge: Richard A Jones
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1391 Personal Injury
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2010 Filing 37 MEMORANDUM of USCA (09-35823-NOT THE MANDATE) as to 30 Notice of Appeal, filed by Laura Krottner, Ishaya Shamasa; Affirmed. (LMK)
September 21, 2009 Filing 36 TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by Plaintiffs Laura Krottner, Ishaya Shamasa Requesting Attorney: Gretchen Freeman Cappio. (Cappio, Gretchen)
September 16, 2009 Filing 35 TIME SCHEDULE ORDER as to 30 Notice of Appeal filed by Laura Krottner, Ishaya Shamasa : Appellants opening brief due by 10/26/09; Appellees response brief due by 11/25/09; Appellants optional reply brief due within 14 days of service of the response brief. (SA)
September 16, 2009 USCA Case Number 09-35823 for 30 Notice of Appeal filed by Laura Krottner, Ishaya Shamasa. (SA)
September 11, 2009 Filing 34 APPEAL NOTIFICATION packet sent to US Court of Appeals re 30 Notice of Appeal (Attachments: # 1 Docket)(LMK)
September 11, 2009 Filing 33 CERTIFICATE OF RECORD Transmitted to USCA re 30 Notice of Appeal (LMK)
September 11, 2009 Filing 32 REPRESENTATION STATEMENT, by Plaintiffs Laura Krottner, Ishaya Shamasa, (re: 30 Notice of Appeal.) (Cappio, Gretchen)
September 11, 2009 Filing 31 Civil Appeals Docketing Statement by Plaintiffs Laura Krottner, Ishaya Shamasa, to be transmitted by Clerk to Circuit Court of Appeals. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Cappio, Gretchen)
September 11, 2009 Filing 30 NOTICE OF Joint APPEAL (09-35823) as to 28 Order on Motion to Consolidate Cases,, Order on Motion to Dismiss, 29 Judgment by Court by Plaintiffs Laura Krottner, Ishaya Shamasa. Filing Fee $455, Receipt number 09810000000001851487. (Cappio, Gretchen) Modified on 9/16/2009 (SA).
August 14, 2009 Filing 29 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE/DECISON BY COURT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED; In accordance with the court's order dismissing this action, judgment is entered for Defendant. (CL)
August 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court GRANTS Starbucks' motion to dismiss(Dkt. # 21 ) and DENIES Plaintiffs' motion to consolidate this action with the Lalli action (Dkt. # 13 ) as moot. The court directs the clerk to enter judgment for Starbucks. The court will enter a separate order in the Lalli action directing the clerk to enter judgment for Starbucks.(CL)
August 7, 2009 Filing 27 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRCP 7.1. by Starbucks Corporation Filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation.(Skok, Gavin)
July 28, 2009 Filing 26 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Continuing Class Certification Deadline by parties. (Cappio, Gretchen)
June 5, 2009 Filing 25 REPLY, filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation, TO RESPONSE to 21 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) (Quackenbush, Karl)
May 28, 2009 Filing 24 NOTICE that the following is RE-NOTED: 21 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6). Filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation. Noting Date 6/5/2009, (Quackenbush, Karl)
May 26, 2009 Filing 23 RESPONSE, by Plaintiffs Laura Krottner, Ishaya Shamasa, to 21 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6). (Cappio, Gretchen)
May 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 22 STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED; The filing deadline for the combined joint status report and discovery plan under FRCP 26(f) and Local Rule CR 16 of May 4, 2009, the April 27, 2009 deadline for the exchange of initial disclosures, and the April 20, 2009 deadline for holding a FRCP 26(f) conference are hereby STRICKEN. The Court will reset those deadlines after the Court rules on Defendant's motions to dismiss the Amended Complaints.(CL)
May 7, 2009 Filing 21 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) by Defendant Starbucks Corporation. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 5/29/2009, (Quackenbush, Karl)
May 4, 2009 Filing 20 RESPONSE, by Defendant Starbucks Corporation, to 13 MOTION to Consolidate Cases and Appoint Interim Co-Lead Counsel. (Quackenbush, Karl)
May 1, 2009 Filing 19 Stipulated MOTION And Proposed Order Continuing Rule 26 Report And Related Deadlines by Defendant Starbucks Corporation. Noting Date 5/1/2009, (Skok, Gavin)
May 1, 2009 ***Motion terminated: 12 Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6) filed by Starbucks Corporation, per Defendant's request to withdraw the motion. (VE)
April 28, 2009 Filing 18 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Starbucks Corporation with JURY DEMAND, filed by Ishaya Shamasa, Laura Krottner. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Mensher, Ian)
April 24, 2009 Filing 17 NOTICE that the following is RE-NOTED: 12 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6). Filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation. Noting Date 5/8/2009, (Quackenbush, Karl)
April 20, 2009 Filing 16 DECLARATION of Lynn Lincoln Sarko filed by Plaintiff Laura Krottner re 13 MOTION to Consolidate Cases and Appoint Interim Co-Lead Counsel (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Firm Resume)(Sarko, Lynn)
April 20, 2009 Filing 15 DECLARATION of Ben Barnow filed by Plaintiff Laura Krottner re 13 MOTION to Consolidate Cases and Appoint Interim Co-Lead Counsel (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Firm Resume)(Sarko, Lynn)
April 20, 2009 Filing 14 DECLARATION of Karen J. Marcus filed by Plaintiff Laura Krottner re 13 MOTION to Consolidate Cases and Appoint Interim Co-Lead Counsel (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Firm Resume)(Sarko, Lynn)
April 20, 2009 Filing 13 MOTION to Consolidate Cases and Appoint Interim Co-Lead Counsel by Plaintiff Laura Krottner. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 5/8/2009, (Sarko, Lynn)
April 9, 2009 Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6) by Defendant Starbucks Corporation. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 5/1/2009, (Quackenbush, Karl)
March 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENT. FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 4/20/2009, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 4/27/2009, Joint Status Report due by 5/4/2009, by Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE)
March 11, 2009 Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE of summons upon defendant Starbucks Corporation mailed on 2/20/2009 (Griffin, Mark)
March 9, 2009 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Karl Justin Quackenbush on behalf of Defendant Starbucks Corporation. (Quackenbush, Karl)
March 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER re 5 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Karen J Marcus for Laura Krottner, by Bruce Rifkin. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS)
March 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re 4 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Eugene J. Benick for Laura Krottner, by Bruce Rifkin. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS)
March 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER re 3 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Mila F. Bartos for Laura Krottner, by Bruce Rifkin. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS)
March 4, 2009 Filing 5 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Karen J. Marcus FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Laura Krottner (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 09810000000001688380. (Attachments: # 1 ECF Registration)(Cappio, Gretchen)
March 4, 2009 Filing 4 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Eugene J. Benick FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Laura Krottner (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 09810000000001688374. (Attachments: # 1 ECF Application)(Cappio, Gretchen)
March 4, 2009 Filing 3 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Mila F. Bartos FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Laura Krottner (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 09810000000001688368. (Attachments: # 1 ECF Registration)(Cappio, Gretchen)
February 20, 2009 Filing 2 Letter from Clerk, U.S. District Court to out of state counsel re pro hac vice/ECF requirement. (mailed copies to M. Bartos, K. Marcus, and E. Benick) (PM)
February 19, 2009 Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT and JURY TRIAL DEMANDED against defendant Starbucks Corporation (NO Summons(es) issued)(Receipt # SEA 24082), filed by Laura Krottner. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits A-C to Complaint, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(PM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Krottner v. Starbucks Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laura Krottner
Represented By: Lynn Lincoln Sarko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?