Jama v. United States of America et al
Habibo A Jama |
United States of America, City of Seattle, City of Tukwila, Robert Brooks, Michelle Hackett, Todd Harris, Matt Ness, Joe Pioli, Jennine Smith, Steve Wilske and John Does |
2:2009cv00256 |
February 26, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
King |
Ricardo S Martinez |
None |
U.S. Government Defendant |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 121 ORDER by Judge John C Coughenour. The Court hereby GRANTS the motion for summary judgment of Defendant City of Seattle and Defendants Todd Harris, Matt Ness, Joe Pioli, and Steve Wilske. (Dkt. No. 91 ). The Court DENIES Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment against the same defendants. (Dkt. No. 96 ). The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the motion for summary judgment of Defendant United States Government. (Dkt. No. 86 ). The Court DENIES the motion for summary judgment of Defendant City of Tukwila. (Dkt. No. 77 ). Finally, the Court STRIKES Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. (Dkt. No. 84 ).(CL) |
Filing 82 ORDER granting dfts' 34 Motion to Dismiss and motion for summary judgment of dfts Robert Brooks, Michele Hacket and Jennine Smith by Judge John C Coughenour.(RS) |
Filing 60 ORDER granting plaintiff's 47 Motion for leave to file second amended complaint ; renoting 34 MOTION to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment : Noting Date 11/13/2009, by Judge Ricardo S Martinez.(RS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.