United States of America v. McMackin

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Tom McMackin
Case Number: 2:2009cv00337
Filed: March 16, 2009
Court: Washington Western District Court
Office: Rent Lease & Ejectment Office
County: King
Presiding Judge: Thomas S. Zilly
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1345 Recovery of Debt to US

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 21, 2010 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. GSA's motion for summary judgment, docket no. 12 , is GRANTED. Defendant's motion to compel discovery, docket no. 16 , is DENIED. Defendant's motion to extend discovery deadline, docket no. 17 , is STRICKEN as moot. (cc: dft) (CL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. McMackin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Robert Patrick Brouillard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tom McMackin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?