Rynearson v. Motricity Inc
Plaintiff: Susan Rynearson
Defendant: Motricity Inc
Case Number: 2:2009cv00393
Filed: March 25, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office
County: XX US, Outside District
Presiding Judge: Marsha J. Pechman
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Notice of Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER granting in part Plaintiff's submission for fees and costs. The Court Orders Defendant to remit $17,921.00 in fees and $450.00 in costs to Plaintiff's counsel within fifteen days of this Order,by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (RK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rynearson v. Motricity Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan Rynearson
Represented By: Clifford A Cantor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Motricity Inc
Represented By: Stellman Keehnel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?