Miller et al v. Media Acquisition Services Corp et al
| Jon Miller, Tyler Dary, Tim Fujita-Yuhas, Ian Garrison, Tim Hinderliter, Deidra Johnson, Pedro Margate, Steven Ohmert, Jeffrey Payne, Stephen Speicher and Charles Tso |
| Media Acquisition Services Corp, Adam Cohen, Jennifer Sultan and Charles Picasso |
| 2:2009cv01425 |
| October 9, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| James L. Robart |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
ORDER granting 102 Plaintiffs' unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment, by Judge James L. Robart.(MD) Modified on 7/2/2014-mailed copy of order to Pro Se Parties (MD).
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND LIFTING STAY - Motions terminated: 101 MOTION to Dismiss All Claims Against Defendant Media Services Acquisition Corp., by Judge James L. Robart. (MD) Modified on 6/30/2014- cc to pro se party (MD).
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER granting 93 Plaintiff Tim Fujita-Yuhas's Motion to Dismiss Party without prejudice. Defendants Adam B Cohen and Jennifer Sultan terminated, by Judge James L. Robart.(MD, mailed copy of order to pro se parties)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER granting 89 Defendant/Crossclaimant Charles Picasso's Motion to Dismiss by Judge James L. Robart.(MD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
