Mansker v. Farmers Insurance Company of Washington
| Brad N Mansker |
| Farmers Insurance Company of Washington, Farmers Insurance Exchange, Farmers Insurance Company Inc, Illinois Farmers Insurance Company Inc, Farmers New Century Insurance Company, Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona, Farmers Insurance Company of Columbus Inc, Farmers Insurance Company of Oregon, Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company, Texas Farmers Insurance Company, Mid-Century Insurance Company of Texas, Mid-Century Insurance and Does I-XX |
| 2:2010cv00511 |
| March 25, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| James L. Robart |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING 114 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss without prejudice by Judge James L. Robart.(MD)
|
|
Filing
92
PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER: Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification Due: February 18, 2011 (To be noted for considerationon April 15, 2011.) Defendants Response Due: March 18, 2011Plaintiffs Reply Due: April 15, 2011. Discovery completed by 2/4/2011, Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 11/19/2010, Rebuttal Expert Disclosure/Reports due by 12/10/2010, by Judge James L. Robart. (MD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
