Nouveau Vision, Inc. v. Transitions Optical, Inc. et al
| Nouveau Vision, Inc. |
| Transitions Optical, Inc., Essilor of America, Inc. and Essilor Laboratories of America, Inc. |
| 2:2010cv00547 |
| March 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| John C Coughenour |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE: 2:10-cv-00547 DETAILS: Case transferred from Washington Western has been opened in Middle District of Florida as case 8:10-cv-01850, filed 08/18/2010. (RS) |
| Filing 39 MDL 2173 TRANSFER ORDER in re Photochromic Lens Antitrust; Middle Dist FL; assigned to Judge James D Whittemore. Clerk transferred case electronically on 8/18/10 (RS) |
Filing 38
ORDER FROM MDL PANEL RENAMING LITIGATION MDL 2173 as in re: Photochromic Lens Antitrust Litigation (RS)
|
|
Filing 36
CORRECTED ORDER re #35 Order on Motion to Consolidate Cases; pltf's motion to consolidate is STRICKEN by Judge John C Coughenour. (TF)
|
|
Filing 35
ORDER striking deft's #34 Motion to Consolidate Cases by Judge John C Coughenour.(TF) Modified on 6/21/2010/ This Order has been corrected at #36 (TF).
|
| Filing 34 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Plaintiff Nouveau Vision, Inc.. Noting Date 6/11/2010, (Taylor, Paul) |
|
Filing 33
ORDER by Judge John C Coughenour. Based on the stipulation of the parties, docket no. #32 , dfts' ddl to respond to the complaint are extended as described therein, (see docket no. #32 at 3)(CL)
|
| Filing 32 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFS. TO ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLTF'S COMPLAINT by parties. (Taylor, Paul) |
| Filing 31 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Essilor Laboratories of America, Inc. on 4/6/2010, filed by Plaintiff Nouveau Vision, Inc.. (Curley, Andrew) |
| Filing 30 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Essilor of America, Inc. on 4/6/2010, filed by Plaintiff Nouveau Vision, Inc.. (Curley, Andrew) |
| Filing 29 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Transitions Optical, Inc. on 4/7/2010, filed by Plaintiff Nouveau Vision, Inc.. (Curley, Andrew) |
|
Filing 27
ORDER by Judge John C Coughenour. Based on the Stipulation of the Parties (docket no. #12 ) to extend ddl to file an answer. Dfts' time to answer or otherwise respond to pltf's complaint is extended to June 11, 2010.(CL)
|
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Douglas C. Ross on behalf of Defendants Essilor of America, Inc., Essilor Laboratories of America, Inc.. (Ross, Douglas) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER re #19 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Joyce E. Choi for Transitions Optical, Inc., by Bruce Rifkin. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS)
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER re #18 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Jeffrey C. Bank for Transitions Optical, Inc., by Bruce Rifkin. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER re #17 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Lisa A. Davis for Transitions Optical, Inc., by Bruce Rifkin. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER re #16 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Renata B. Hesse for Transitions Optical, Inc., by Bruce Rifkin. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER re #15 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Chul Pak for Transitions Optical, Inc., by Bruce Rifkin. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER re #14 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Jonathan M Jacobson for Transitions Optical, Inc., by Bruce Rifkin. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS)
|
| Filing 19 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Joyce E. Choi FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Transitions Optical, Inc. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 09810000000002046357. (Kaplan, Barry) |
| Filing 18 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Jeffrey C. Bank FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Transitions Optical, Inc. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 09810000000002046348. (Kaplan, Barry) |
| Filing 17 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Lisa A. Davis FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Transitions Optical, Inc. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 09810000000002046341. (Kaplan, Barry) |
| Filing 16 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Renata B. Hesse FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Transitions Optical, Inc. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 09810000000002046325. (Kaplan, Barry) |
| Filing 15 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Chul Pak FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Transitions Optical, Inc. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 09810000000002046318. (Kaplan, Barry) |
| Filing 14 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Jonathan M. Jacobson FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Transitions Optical, Inc. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 09810000000002046298. (Kaplan, Barry) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Barry M Kaplan on behalf of Defendant Transitions Optical, Inc.. (Kaplan, Barry) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Extending Defendants' Time to Answer by parties re #1 Complaint. (Ross, Douglas) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER re #7 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Martin I Twersky for Nouveau Vision, Inc., by Bruce Rifkin. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER re #6 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Merrill G. Davidoff for Nouveau Vision, Inc., by Bruce Rifkin. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER re #5 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Andrew C. Curley for Nouveau Vision, Inc., by Bruce Rifkin. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER re #4 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Bart D Cohen for Nouveau Vision, Inc., by Bruce Rifkin. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS)
|
| Filing 7 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Martin I. Twersky FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Nouveau Vision, Inc. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 09810000000002030543. (Taylor, Paul) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Merrill G. Davidoff FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Nouveau Vision, Inc. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 09810000000002030533. (Taylor, Paul) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Andrew C. Curley FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Nouveau Vision, Inc. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 09810000000002030524. (Taylor, Paul) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Bart D. Cohen FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Nouveau Vision, Inc. (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 09810000000002030401. (Taylor, Paul) |
| Filing 3 REMINDER NOTICE to out of state counsel re pro hac vice admission. (hard copy sent to attorneys H. Montague, M. Davidoff, B. Cohen & A. Curley)(PM) |
| Filing 2 Summons electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Essilor Laboratories of America, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons for Essilor of America, Inc., #2 Summons for Transitions Optical, Inc.)(PM) |
| Judge John C Coughenour added. (PM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (CLASS ACTION) against defendant(s) all defendants (Receipt # 09810000000002025993), filed by Nouveau Vision, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Taylor, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
