Dantonio v. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory

Plaintiff: Marylou Dantonio
Defendant: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory (SEDL)
Case Number: 2:2010cv01193
Filed: July 22, 2010
Court: Washington Western District Court
Office: Seattle Office
County: Snohomish
Presiding Judge: Robert S. Lasnik
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 17:101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 26, 2011 58 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Granting Defts' 21 23 Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction by Judge Robert S. Lasnik; The Court also DENIES Dr Slack's motion for attorney's fees; Pltf's action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (TF) Text Modified on 5/27/2011 (TF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dantonio v. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marylou Dantonio
Represented By: Nathaniel Eli Durrance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory (SEDL)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.