Kral v. King County et al
| William Michael Kral |
| King County and Washington Association of Sheriffs and Chiefs of Police |
| 2:2010cv01360 |
| August 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendant King County's 38 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying plaintiff's 42 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and granting in part and denying in part defendant WASPC's 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint identifying the proper ADA title, Title II, in relation to this claims against WASPC within 15 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler.(GB)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER extending reply time. Signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (GB)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting 35 Stipulated Motion to extend discovery deadline for limited purpose of completing plaintiff's deposition. Also, trial date and remaining pretrial deadlines are rescheduled. Order at 36 is STRICKEN. Signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler.(GB)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting 31 Stipulated Motion; Motions terminated: 31 Stipulated MOTION to Extend Discovery filed by Washington Association of Sheriffs and Chiefs of Police. Signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler.(GB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
