Diederich v. Providence Health & Services et al
| Robert J. Diederich |
| Providence Health & Services, Kevin Haughton, Maggie Miller, Lisa Johnson, Lowell Dightman, Geoff Ankeney, Michael Matlock, Lori Vanzanten and Jennifer Playstead |
| 2:2010cv01558 |
| September 28, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
162
ORDER denying defendant's 148 Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge Richard A Jones.(RS)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER denying pltf's 116 Motion for Reconsideration by Judge Richard A Jones.(RS)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER GRANTING DFTS' SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; the court GRANTS defendants motion for summary judgment. Dkt. # 51. The Clerk is directed to terminate the first partial summary judgment motion and motion to supplement the opposition with respect to the first summary judgment motion as MOOT. Dkt. # 31, # 45. The Clerk is also directed to terminate the parties motions to supplement the record with respect to the second partial summary judgment motion as DENIED. Dkt. # 87, # 89. The Clerk is also directed to enter an amended scheduling order with a new trial date of December 3, 2012 on the remaining claim of breach of contract against Providence. by Judge Richard A Jones.(RS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
