Toward Responsible Development et al v. City of Black Diamond et al
| Toward Responsible Development, Cynthia A Wheeler, William B Wheeler, Robert M Edelman, Peter Rimbos, Michael E Irrgang, Judith Carrier, Eugene J May, Vicki Harp, Cindy Proctor and Estate of William C Harp |
| City of Black Diamond, BD Lawson Partners, LP, BD Village Partners, LP and King County |
| 2:2010cv01826 |
| November 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 Petitioners' Motion to Stay; denying 25 Black Diamond's Motion to Dismiss; granting 26 Yarrow Bay's Motion to Dismiss; granting 28 Petitioners' Motion for Extension of Time; denying 8 as Moot Petitioners' Motion to adjust case schedule ; granting in part and denying in part 9 Yarrow Bay's Motion to Bifurcate, stay discovery and set LUPA schedule, by Judge James L. Robart.(MD)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER REMANDING STATE LAW CLAIMS - the court REMANDS Petitioners LUPA claims based on state law to King County Superior Court. The court reserves ruling on the scope of the stay of the proceedings in this court until after briefingon the order to show cause is complete, by Judge James L. Robart. (MD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
