Moore v. ING Bank FSB
Plaintiff: Karen D Moore
Defendant: ING Bank FSB
Case Number: 2:2011cv00139
Filed: January 25, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: Island
Presiding Judge: Thomas S. Zilly
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER granting in part and denying in part dft ING's 19 Motion for Attorney Fees by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(RS)
May 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. The Court GRANTS ING's motion to dismiss, docket no. 9 , and DISMISSES Moore's claims with prejudice.(CL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. ING Bank FSB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karen D Moore
Represented By: Charles M. Greenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ING Bank FSB
Represented By: William A Kinsel
Represented By: Gary W Park
Represented By: Kiran Singh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?