REC Software USA, Inc. v. Bamboo Solutions Corporation et al
| REC Software USA, Inc. |
| Bamboo Solutions Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, SAP America, Inc. and SAP, AG |
| Microsoft Corporation, SAP, AG and SAP America, Inc. |
| REC Software USA, Inc. |
| 2:2011cv00554 |
| March 31, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| XX US, Outside District |
| James L. Robart |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
416
ORDER denying 404 Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Motion to compel, by Judge James L. Robart.(MD)
|
|
Filing
319
ORDER denying 188 Microsoft's motion for summary judgment, by Judge James L. Robart.(MD)
|
|
Filing
290
ORDER - the court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Microsofts motion (Dkt. ## 201 202 ) to strike portions of RECs 1st Levine Report. The court GRANTS Microsofts request to serve a supplemental expert report on invalidity limited to addressing RECs theory of infringement for the second multi-module program limitation. Microsoft shall serve any supplemental expert report no later than September 1, 2012. The court DENIES all other requests in Microsofts motion, by Judge James L. Robart.(MD)
|
|
Filing
281
ORDER denying 168 Plaintiff's Motion to strike portions of Microsoft's Kogan Report, by Judge James L. Robart.(MD)
|
|
Filing
159
ORDER ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION by Judge James L. Robart. (MD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
