Fenske-Buchanan v. Bank of America NA, et al
| PK Fenske-Buchanan |
| Bank of America N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing LP and Corporate John Does |
| 2:2011cv01656 |
| October 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Marsha J. Pechman |
| Other Contract |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion to Compel; denying 51 Motion for Sanctions; granting 58 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; denying 60 Motion to Strike Response ; granting 64 Motion for Reconsideration. Parties are to submit a revised case schedule by 6/21/12; signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(SC)
|
|
Filing
77
MINUTE ORDER denying 75 MOTION to Seal filed by Bank of America N.A.; signed by Docket Clerk M Duett at the direction of Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SC)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion to Dismiss; signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(SC)
|
|
Filing
40
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER, signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SC)
|
|
Filing
38
MINUTE ORDER 37 re: Stipulated Protective Order filed by Bank of America N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing LP. The Court requires a provision concerning the filing of sealed documents in accordance with LR 5(g); signed by Docket Clerk M Duett at the direction of Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
