Scarsella Bros., Inc v. Federal Insurance Company
| Scarsella Bros Inc |
| Federal Insurance Company |
| 2:2012cv01759 |
| October 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER granting parties' 65 Joint Stipulated MOTION. This action, including all litigation deadlines in the current Case Schedule are hereby further STAYED until 6/28/2024, and that all deadlines are further tolled. The parties shall file a joint status report with the Court no later than 6/21/2024. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (MJV)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER granting Parties' 63 Joint Stipulated MOTION to Further Stay Proceedings to Allow for Continued Settlement Discussions and Alternative Dispute Resolution. This action, including all litigation deadlines in the current Case Schedule are hereby further STAYED until December 22, 2023, and that all deadlines are further tolled. Parties shall file a joint status report with the Court no later than December 15, 2023. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MJV)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER re Parties' 61 Stipulated MOTION For Change of Counsel Firm Affiliation. Defendant Federal Insurance Company's counsel, Peter J. Mintzer has changed his firm affiliation, effective 1/1/2023. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH) (cc: ECF Team)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER Staying Case re Parties' Joint 59 Motion to Stay. All litigation deadlines in the current Case Schedule are hereby further STAYED until 6/30/2023. The parties shall file a joint status report with the Court no later than 6/23/2023. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SR)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER Staying Case re Parties' Joint 57 Motion to Stay. All litigation deadlines in the current Case Schedule are hereby further STAYED until October 28, 2022. The parties shall file a joint status report with the Court no later than October 21, 2022. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER re Parties' 55 Joint Stipulated MOTION to Further Stay Proceedings to Allow for Continued Settlement Discussions and ADR. All litigation deadlines in the current Case Schedule are hereby further STAYED until 6/10/2022. The parties shall file a joint status report with the Court no later than 6/3/2022. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER STAYING CASE re Parties' 53 Stipulated Motion. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action, including all litigation deadlines in the current Case Schedule are hereby further STAYED until November 12, 2021. Joint Status Report due by 11/5/2021. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER STAYING CASE re Parties' 51 Stipulated Motion. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action, including all litigation deadlines in the current Case Schedule are hereby further STAYED until 8/6/2021, and that all deadlines are further tolled. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint status report with the Court no later than 7/30/2021. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER STAYING CASE re Parties' 49 Stipulation: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action, including all litigation deadlines in the current Case Schedule are hereby further STAYED until April 23, 2021, and that all deadlines are further tolled. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint status report with the Court no later than April 16, 2021. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER STAYING CASE re Parties' 47 Stipulation: This action, including all litigation deadlines in the current Case Schedule, are hereby further STAYED until 11/20/2020, and that all deadlines are further tolled. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint status report with the Court no later than 11/13/2020. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (MW)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER staying case re Parties' 45 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (MW)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER further staying case. Joint Status Report due by 11/15/2019. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER STAYING CASE re parties' 40 Stipulation; Joint Status Report due by 3/25/2019, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER STAYING CASE re parties' 38 Stipulated Motion; Joint Status Report due by 7/6/2018, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER STAYING CASE re parties' 36 Stipulated Motion; Joint Status Report due by 1/12/2018, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Scarsella Bros., Inc v. Federal Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Scarsella Bros Inc | |
| Represented By: | Dale L Kingman |
| Represented By: | Matthew F Pierce |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Federal Insurance Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
