Calcote v. Herzog

Petitioner: Bertran Calcote
Respondent: Robert Herzog
Case Number: 2:2013cv00614
Filed: April 4, 2013
Court: Washington Western District Court
Office: Seattle Office
County: King
Presiding Judge: Richard A Jones
Referring Judge: Mary Alice Theiler
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 24, 2013 13 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Judge Richard A Jones; The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's federal habeas petition (Dkt. No. 1 ) is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. (TF) Modified on 12/24/2013 (TF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Calcote v. Herzog
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Bertran Calcote
Represented By: Darrel Lance Lahtinen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert Herzog
Represented By: John Joseph Samson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.