Employee Painters' Trust Health & Welfare Plan et al v. Sherman et al
Plaintiff: Resilient Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund, District Council No. 5 Painters and Allied Trades Apprenticeship and Training Trust, The Painters and Allied Trades Labor-Management Cooperation Initiative, Allied Trades Training Center, International Union of Painters & Allied Trades District Council No. 5 and Employee Painters' Trust Health & Welfare Plan
Defendant: Wesco Insurance Company, American Contractors Indemnity Company, Jane Scott Sherman, SWS Flooring LLC, Scott William Sherman, Jane Don Sherman, Jane Donnie Sherman, Don Duane Sherman and Donnie Shane Sherman
Case Number: 2:2013cv00687
Filed: April 17, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: King
Presiding Judge: Thomas S. Zilly
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER denying Wesco's 37 Motion for Attorney Fees and granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' 42 Motion for Default Judgment by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.Plaintiffs' to submit status report within four months. (LMK)
May 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER denying pltfs' 40 Motion for reconsideration by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(RS) cc WA State AG
April 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Wesco's motion for summary judgment, docket no. 26 , is treated in part as a motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process; the motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process is GRANTED, and Wesco 's motion for summary judgment is otherwise STRICKEN as moot; plaintiffs' claims against Wesco are DISMISSED without prejudice; ACIC's motion for summary judgment, docket no. 28 , is treated in part as a motion to dismiss for insuffic ient service of process; the motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process is GRANTED, and ACIC's motion for summary judgment is otherwise STRICKEN as moot; plaintiffs' claims against ACIC are DISMISSED without prejudice; Plaintiffs may renew their motion for default judgment against the remaining defendants by filing such motion within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of this Order. The court strikes the trial date and all related deadlines. (CL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Employee Painters' Trust Health & Welfare Plan et al v. Sherman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wesco Insurance Company
Represented By: Paul Keane Friedrich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Contractors Indemnity Company
Represented By: John Stanford York, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Scott Sherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SWS Flooring LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott William Sherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Don Sherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Donnie Sherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Don Duane Sherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donnie Shane Sherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Resilient Floor Covering Pension Trust Fund
Represented By: Michael A Urban
Represented By: Evan L James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: District Council No. 5 Painters and Allied Trades Apprenticeship and Training Trust
Represented By: Michael A Urban
Represented By: Evan L James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Painters and Allied Trades Labor-Management Cooperation Initiative
Represented By: Michael A Urban
Represented By: Evan L James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allied Trades Training Center
Represented By: Michael A Urban
Represented By: Evan L James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: International Union of Painters & Allied Trades District Council No. 5
Represented By: Michael A Urban
Represented By: Evan L James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Employee Painters' Trust Health & Welfare Plan
Represented By: Michael A Urban
Represented By: Evan L James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?