Tse v. United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 367 et al
| Wing Kai Tse |
| United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 367 and Does |
| 2:2013cv00746 |
| April 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Richard A Jones |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER re: Pltf's request for extension for filing the notice of appeal by Judge Richard A Jones. The court has already granted plaintiff's prior requests for extension of time. He has until April 23, 2014 to file a notice of appeal. The court will not respond to any further requests from plaintiff in this case.1 This case is closed.(CL) (cc: pltf)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court GRANTS plaintiffs 14 motion to extend the time to file a notice of appeal.(CL) (cc: pltf)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court GRANTS plaintiff's 11 motion to extend the time to file a notice of appeal. (CL) Modified on 4/3/2014 (CL). (cc: pltf)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court GRANTS defendants' motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. (CL) (cc: pltf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
