Trader Joe's Company v. Hallatt et al
Trader Joe's Company |
Michael Norman Hallatt and Does 1-10 |
Michael Norman Hallatt |
Trader Joe's Company |
2:2013cv00768 |
May 1, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
XX US, Outside District |
Marsha J. Pechman |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 DECLARATION of Michael Hallatt filed by Defendant Michael Norman Hallatt re 25 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Alexander, Nathan) |
Filing 25 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Defendant Michael Norman Hallatt. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 8/23/2013, (Alexander, Nathan) |
Filing 24 AMENDMENT to 17 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim, 1 Complaint by Defendant Michael Norman Hallatt. (Alexander, Nathan) |
Filing 23 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 22 Stipulation to extend deadline for Trader Joe's to respond to defendant's counterclaim filed by Trader Joe's Company by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD) |
Filing 22 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Extending Deadline for Trader Joe's to Respond to Defendant's Counterclaim by parties. (Roller, Jeremy) |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Patchen Marie Haggerty on behalf of Defendant Michael Norman Hallatt. (Haggerty, Patchen) |
Filing 20 NOTICE REGARDING LACK OF PROPER SIGNATURE. The 19 Notice of Appearance filed on 7/1/2013 was improperly signed by PATCHEN M HAGGERTY. As such, one or more attorneys were not added to the case and will not receive future notices until corrected. Pursuant to FRCP Rule 11 and LCR 83.2(a), signatures must comply with Section III(L) of the Electronic Filing Procedures, which states, "An electronically filed pleading or other document which requires an attorney's signature must have the signors' names printed or typed on the line and under all signature lines." (KN) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Nathan Thomas Alexander on behalf of Defendant Michael Norman Hallatt. (Alexander, Nathan) |
Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER: At the request of the Defendant, with no opposition from Plaintiff, an extension of time to file the joint status report is granted. The report will be due on 8/16/2013. All other FRCP 26-related deadlines are adjusted accordingly. Failure to adhere to these deadlines may result in sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this action. Authorized by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (RM) |
Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND, COUNTERCLAIM against plaintiff Trader Joe's Company by Michael Norman Hallatt.(Hallatt, Michael) |
Filing 16 NOTICE: Defendant Michael Norman Hallatt has registered to electronically file and receive electronic service in this case. (KN) |
Filing 15 SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER re 13 Stipulation extending deadine for defendant to file a responsive pleading filed by Trader Joe's Company by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD) |
Filing 14 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 7/15/2013, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 7/1/2013, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 7/8/2013, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (RM) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER (Second) Extending Deadline for Defendant to File a Responsive Pleading by parties. (Wilsdon, Scott) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 11 Stipulation extending deadline for defendant to file a responsive pleading filed by Trader Joe's Company by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Extending Deadline for Defendant to File a Responsive Pleading by parties. (Wilsdon, Scott) |
Filing 10 DECLARATION of Jeremy Roller for Personal Service Out of State by Plaintiff Trader Joe's Company. (Roller, Jeremy) |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Michael Norman Hallatt on 5/8/2013, filed by Plaintiff Trader Joe's Company. (Wilsdon, Scott) |
Filing 8 Summons electronically issued as to defendant(s) Michael Norman Hallatt. (RE) |
Filing 6 ORDER re 4 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Jordan Raphael for Trader Joe's Company, by William M. McCool. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS) |
Filing 5 ORDER re 3 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Brian M. Berliner for Trader Joe's Company, by William M. McCool. (No document associated with this docket entry, text only.)(DS) |
Judge Marsha J. Pechman added. (RE) |
Filing 7 REPORT on the filing or determination of a Trademark action. E-mailed to the US Patent & Trademark Office. (Attachments: # 1 Trademark Report filed by counsel) (RE) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Jordan Raphael FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Trader Joe's Company (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-3194494. (Roller, Jeremy) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Brian M. Berliner FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Trader Joe's Company (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-3194473. (Roller, Jeremy) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent T.A.C.T. Holding, Inc. for Trader Joe's Company. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Plaintiffs Trader Joe's Company, T.A.C.T. Holding, Inc.. (Roller, Jeremy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) All Defendants (Receipt # 0981-3194202), filed by Trader Joe's Company. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form120))(Roller, Jeremy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.