Manchester et al v. Ceco Concrete Construction, LLC
Plaintiff: Alan Manchester, Suzanne Manchester and Bedrock Floors, Inc.
Defendant: Ceco Concrete Construction, LLC
Case Number: 2:2013cv00832
Filed: May 10, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: King
Presiding Judge: Richard A Jones
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER granting deft Ceco's 72 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Mr. Manchester's 75 Motion for Summary Judgment. Clerk to enter judgment in favor of Ceco and against Mr. Manchester by Judge Richard A Jones.(PM)
November 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER granting in part and denying in part dft Ceco Concrete Construction's 41 Motion for Judgment; granting in part and denying in part pltf Alan Manchester's 49 third Motion to Amend complaint; second amended complaint due 12/5/14 by Judge Richard A Jones.(RS)
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by Judge Richard A Jones.(MD)
May 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 24 AMENDED ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. This amended order corrects a clerical error in the final paragraph of the order, and replaces the prior order at Dkt. # 23 . Neither party has requested oral argument. This matter may be decided on the papers submitted. (CL)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court GRANTS 20 defendant's motion with respect to Bedrock's claims, and DENIES defendant's motion with respect to Mrs. Manchester's claim. Plaintiffs may file their First Amended Complaint consistent with this order within fourteen (14) days of this order. (CL)
February 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 Defendant's Motion to Compel; denying 13 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend, by Judge Richard A Jones.(MD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Manchester et al v. Ceco Concrete Construction, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alan Manchester
Represented By: William P McArdel, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Suzanne Manchester
Represented By: William P McArdel, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bedrock Floors, Inc.
Represented By: William P McArdel, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ceco Concrete Construction, LLC
Represented By: Jacob M Downs
Represented By: James B Stoetzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?