Cook v. Providence Health & Services et al
Margaret Cook |
Providence Health & Services, Providence Health & Services - Western Washington, Providence Health & Services - Washington, Providence Health & Services - Oregon, Providence Health & Services - Montana, Providence Physician Services Co and Health Services Asset Management, LLC |
2:2013cv01312 |
July 24, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
Pierce |
Richard A Jones |
False Claims Act |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER Granting Defendants' 22 Motion to Dismiss by Judge Richard A Jones. The clerk shall DISMISS this action with prejudice and enter Judgment for Defendants.(LMK) |
Filing 20 ORDER by Judge Richard A. Jones. The court GRANTS the parties' stipulation re: amended complaint (Dkt. # 19 ). Plaintiffs' second amended complaint (Dkt. # 16 ) is the operative pleading in this case. Defendants shall answer the second amended complaint no later than April 4, 2014. The clerk shall TERMINATE Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 15 ) and Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend her complaint. (Dkt. # 18 ). (CL) |
Filing 10 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 8 Motion for Order Granting Specific Deadline Date to Serve Defendants of the Summons, Complaint and First Amended Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 4(m) by Judge Richard A Jones. (CL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.