Honeywell International Inc v. Maltseff
Plaintiff: Honeywell International Inc, Intermec, Inc. and Intermec Technologies Corporation
Defendant: Paul Maltseff
Case Number: 2:2014cv00283
Filed: February 27, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: XX US, Outside District
Presiding Judge: James L. Robart
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER denying dft Paul Maltseff's 68 Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge James L. Robart.(RS)
April 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER - denying 40 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; striking 41 Defendant's Motion to Expedite; striking 17 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction; striking 25 Plaintiff's Motion to Expedite, striking 37 Defendant's Motion for Disclosure without prejudice to re-filing, by Judge James L. Robart.(MD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Honeywell International Inc v. Maltseff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Honeywell International Inc
Represented By: Ryan Long(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Randall E Kahnke(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Michael J Ewart
Represented By: Martin S. Chester(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Kerry L Bundy(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Louis David Peterson
Represented By: Tyler Young(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Intermec, Inc.
Represented By: Kerry L Bundy(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Martin S. Chester(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Michael J Ewart
Represented By: Randall E Kahnke(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Ryan Long(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Louis David Peterson
Represented By: Tyler Young(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Intermec Technologies Corporation
Represented By: Kerry L Bundy(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Martin S. Chester(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Michael J Ewart
Represented By: Randall E Kahnke(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Ryan Long(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Louis David Peterson
Represented By: Tyler Young(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Maltseff
Represented By: William F Cronin
Represented By: Paul R Raskin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?