Wright v. Lyft, Inc.
| Kenneth Wright |
| Lyft, Inc. |
| 2:2014cv00421 |
| March 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Marsha J. Pechman |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
ORDER re 101 Stipulated Motion Regarding Cy Pres Distribution of Final Settlement Funds: Based on stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby approves distribution of the residual settlement funds held by the claims administrator to the Legal Foundation of Washington as cy pres recipient. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein.(MW)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER re 96 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (TH)
|
|
Filing
73
AMENDED ORDER granting 71 Stipulated Motion to Certify Questions to Washington Supreme Court. The Clerk of the Court is directed to submit to the Supreme Court of Washington certified copies of this Order, a copy of the docket in the above-captio ned matter, and Dkt. Nos. 54 , [56-60], 63 , 65 , and 71 . The case will remain STAYED until the Supreme Court of Washington answers the certified questions. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (PM) cc: copies sent to WA St. Supreme Court via the USPS
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER granting 71 Stipulated Motion to Certify Questions to the Washington Supreme Court. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (PM)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Denying 12 Stipulated MOTION Suspending Deadlines Pending Ruling Regarding Defendant's Renewed Rule 12 Motion by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(RM)
|
|
Filing
11
STIPULATION AND ORDER 10 Stipulated MOTION for and [Proposed] Order filed by Lyft, Inc. Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint by 6/6/2014. Defendant's motion 8 to dismiss for failure to state a claim or for Stay filed by Lyft, Inc., is deemed withdrawn without prejudice. Defendant shall have until 6/26/2014 to file either a revised or renewed Rule 12 motion or an answer to the amended complaint, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (RM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wright v. Lyft, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kenneth Wright | |
| Represented By: | Donald W Heyrich |
| Represented By: | Peter Stutheit |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lyft, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Bradley S Keller |
| Represented By: | Chelsey Lyn Mam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
