Dorsey v. United States of America
Devaughn Dorsey |
United States of America |
2:2014cv00938 |
June 24, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
Robert S. Lasnik |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 85 ORDER denying Petitioner's 77 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH) (cc: USCA) |
Filing 81 ORDER Requesting Response and Re-Noting Petitioner's 77 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability. Response from Government now due by 4/4/2022. Petitioner may now reply by 4/8/2022. The motion is re-noted for 4/8/2022. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH) |
Filing 74 ORDER ON PETITIONER'S 28 U.S.C. § 2255 PETITION AND RELATED MOTIONS. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH) |
Filing 73 ORDER granting Petitioner's 72 Motion to Withdraw Document. Petitioner's previously filed motion to stay the proceedings (Dkt. 57 ) is withdrawn. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH) |
Filing 58 MINUTE ORDER re Petitioner's 57 MOTION for Stay of Proceedings. Motion Noting Date corrected for 8/7/2020. Authorized by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH) |
Filing 54 ORDER granting Parties' 53 Motion for Extension of Time to File an Omnibus Response: Having read and considered the parties' Stipulation Concerning Briefing Schedule, it is therefore ORDERED that the United States has until on or before 6/25/2020, to file its response in this matter, and it is further ORDERED that the Defendant-Petitioner shall have until on or before 7/27/2020, to file any reply and that the matter be noted for 7/31/2020. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW) |
Filing 48 ORDER granting parties' 47 Stipulated Motion Concerning Briefing Schedule. It is therefore ORDERED that the United States has until on or before May 11, 2020, to file its response in this matter, and it is furtherORDERED that the Defendant-Petitioner shall have until on or before June 11, 2020, to file any reply and that the matter be noted for June 11, 2020. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TH) |
Filing 46 ORDER re Parties' 45 Stipulated Motion for an Extension of Time to File and Omnibus Response to Dorsey's 2255 Motion: The United States has until on or before 4/20/2020, to file its response in this matter; Defendant-Petitioner shall have until on or before 5/20/2020, to file any reply. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW) |
Filing 44 ORDER re Parties' 43 Stipulation Concerning Briefing Schedule: The United States has until on or before 3/20/2020, to file its response in this matter; the Defendant-Petitioner shall have until on or before 4/20/2020 to file any reply, and that the matter be noted for 4/20/2020. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW) |
Filing 42 ORDER: Having read and considered the parties' 40 Stipulation Concerning Briefing Schedule, it is therefore ORDERED that the United States has until on or before 3/6/2020, to file its response in this matter, and it is further ORDERED that the Defendant-Petitioner shall have until on or before 4/10/2020, to file any reply and that the matter be noted for 4/10/2020. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (MW) |
Filing 38 ORDER granting Petitioner's 37 Agreed Motion to Lift Stay and Agreed Dates for Further Briefing. The United States' Answer to 2255 petition due 2/21/2020 and shall be noted on 3/20/2020. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (PM) |
Filing 34 ORDER granting Petitioner's 30 Motion to Appoint Counsel; the Court appoints the Federal Public Defender to represent petition in the § 2255 proceeding, signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. (SWT) (cc: Petitioner via USPS; Federal Defender via ad hoc) |
Filing 33 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to US Magistrate Judge Brian A. Tsuchida: Plaintiff's 30 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
Filing 31 ORDER re government's 29 Motion to Stay Briefing Schedule; Briefing schedule as to petitioner's 2255 motion and motions to supplement and amend (dkts. 4 , 9 , 11 , 18 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 27 , and 28 ), is stayed, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Petitioner via USPS) |
Filing 26 ORDER granting Petitioner's 21 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Arturo Menendez terminated. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(TH) (cc: Petitioner via U.S. Mail) |
Filing 19 ORDER RESTORING CASE AND DIRECTING THE UNITED STATES TO ANSWER § 2255 PETITION signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. United States' Answer due within 45 days of this Order. (PM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dorsey v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Devaughn Dorsey | |
Represented By: | Arturo Menendez |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Todd Greenberg |
Represented By: | Jill Otake |
Represented By: | US Attorney Habeas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.