Altaflo, LLC v. Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corporation, et al
Altaflo, LLC |
Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corporation, Dun & Bradstreet Corporation and Dun & Bradstreet Inc |
2:2014cv01288 |
August 15, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
XX US, Outside District |
Thomas S. Zilly |
Other Personal Property Damage |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 117 ORDER to Consolidate, by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Case Nos. C12-2184, C14-855, C14-1021, C14-1288, and C14-1404 are CONSOLIDATED into Case No. C12-2184. The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE Case Nos. C14-855, C14-1021, C14-1288, and C14-1404. All future filings shall bear the cause number C12-2184 TSZ. (SWT) |
Filing 90 ORDER granting 66 MOTION to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) filed by Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corporation; Counts I and II of the Amended Complaint, docket 64 , are DISMISSED, without prejudice, and with leave to file a motion to amend; any such motion shall include a redlined version of a proposed second amended complaint and shall be filed within thirty-five (35) days of the date of this Order by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (RS) |
Filing 24 ORDER granting 11 Stipulated Motion extending deadlines for defendants to file response to the complaint,. The Court hereby WAIVES the pro hac vice filing fee for any attorneys admitted pro hac vice in related case 12-cv-2184, by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(MD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.