Verint Systems Inc. et al v. Envision Telephony, Inc.
Plaintiff: Verint Systems Inc. and Verint Americas Inc.
Defendant: Envision Telephony Inc
Counter_claimant: Envision Telephony Inc
Counter_defendant: Verint Americas Inc. and Verint Systems Inc.
Case Number: 2:2014cv01507
Filed: September 26, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: XX US, Outside District
Presiding Judge: Marsha J. Pechman
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER Denying Plaintiffs' 65 Motion for Retransfer of Venue by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(LMK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Verint Systems Inc. et al v. Envision Telephony, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Verint Systems Inc.
Represented By: Frank T. Carroll
Represented By: Walter Hill Levie, III
Represented By: Ryan N. Miller
Represented By: David Scott Moreland
Represented By: Joseph F. Posillico
Represented By: Stephen M Schaetzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Verint Americas Inc.
Represented By: Frank T. Carroll
Represented By: Walter Hill Levie, III
Represented By: Ryan N. Miller
Represented By: David Scott Moreland
Represented By: Joseph F. Posillico
Represented By: Stephen M Schaetzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Envision Telephony Inc
Represented By: Norman Andrew Crain
Represented By: David A. Lowe
Represented By: Eric Gregory Maurer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Envision Telephony Inc
Represented By: Norman Andrew Crain
Represented By: David A. Lowe
Represented By: Eric Gregory Maurer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Verint Americas Inc.
Represented By: Walter Hill Levie, III
Represented By: David Scott Moreland
Represented By: Stephen M Schaetzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Verint Systems Inc.
Represented By: Walter Hill Levie, III
Represented By: David Scott Moreland
Represented By: Stephen M Schaetzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?