Piersawl v. United States of America et al
| Carolyn E Piersawl |
| United States of America, Unknown John Does and John Doe Clinics |
| 2:2015cv00154 |
| February 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Snohomish |
| John C Coughenour |
| Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
MINUTE ORDER dismissing all claims against Defendant James Swegle with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorney fees to either party, authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
91
MINUTE ORDER dismissing with prejudice Defendant United States of America per FRCP 41(a)(1)(A) and parties' 90 Stipulation. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (PM)
|
|
Filing
89
MINUTE ORDER re 88 Joint Status Report. Clerk is directed to statistically close case pending submission of the parties' dismissal paperwork. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (PM)
|
|
Filing
62
MINUTE ORDER dismissing with prejudice Defendant Custom Ultrasonics, Inc. per 60 Stipulation. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (PM)
|
|
Filing
56
MINUTE ORDER by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour granting Defendants Vincent Tang, M.D. and AMN Healthcare, Inc.'s 51 Motion for Summary Judgment. All claims against Defendants Tang and AMN Healthcare are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. (PM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
