Connolly v. Umpqua Bank et al
| Sarah Connolly |
| Umpqua Bank and Sterling Infosystems, Inc. |
| 2:2015cv00517 |
| April 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Thomas S. Zilly |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
ORDER APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND JUDGMENT; granting plaintiff's 102 Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees; granting plaintiff's 104 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
101
MINUTE ORDER granting the deferred portion of plaintiff's 95 Second Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement as follows (See Minute Order for details): Final Settlement Approval Hearing set for 2/21/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 15206. Any motion for attorney's fees and costs shall be filed by 12/6/2018. Any motion for final approval of the proposed class action settlement shall be filed by January 24, 2019. (Exhibits attached) Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(SWT)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER granting in part and deferring in part plaintiff's 95 Second Unopposed MOTION Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Revised Class Action Settlement; Certifying the following Class for settlement purposes (See Ord er for details); appointing plaintiff Sarah Connolly as Class Representative; RENOTING deferred portion of plaintiff's 95 Second Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement: Noting Date 10/5/2018. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
96
MINUTE ORDER granting plaintiff's 94 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's 95 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Revised Class Action Settlement will be considered timely. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
93
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice to refiling within six weeks Plaintiff's 91 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
90
MINUTE ORDER extending the deadline for parties to file a motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement to 1/30/2018 re parties' 89 Joint Status Report; In the event no such motion is timely filed, the parties shall file a Joint Status Report by 1/31/2018. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
88
MINUTE ORDER denying parties' 87 Joint Motion to Stay; the deadline to file a motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement is January 9, 2018; In the event no such motion is timely filed, the parties shall file a Joint Status Report by January 10, 2018. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
86
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 85 Second Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines: Discovery on class certification completed by 11/7/2017, Joint Status Report due by 12/15/2017, Motions for class certification due by 12/11/2017. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
84
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 83 Joint Motion to Extend Deadline. Discovery on class certification issues due 8/9/2017. Any motion for class certification shall be filed by 9/11/2017. If no motion for class certification is timely filed, the parties shall file a Joint Status Report by 9/15/2017. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
80
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re parties' 79 Stipulation, by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
