Tulalip Tribes et al v. Smith et al
| Tulalip Tribes and Consolidated Borough Quil Ceda Village |
| Vikki Smith, Kirke Sievers, Cindy Portman and Snohomish County |
| 2:2015cv00940 |
| June 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Snohomish |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
266
ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 263 Motion for Relief from Deadline and Stay of Defendants' Motions (Docs. 260 , 262 ) for Costs and Attorneys' Fees. The Court hereby directs Plaintiffs to file any response to the Motions on or before December 14, 2018. Defendants shall file any replies on or before December 21, 2018. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (TH)
|
|
Filing
258
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. The Court hereby finds in favor of Defendants on all claims, and dismisses this case. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein.(SWT)
|
|
Filing
248
ORDER granting State Defendants' 244 Motion to Seal. Exhibit T-1002 245 shall be filed under seal. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (PM)
|
|
Filing
189
ORDER RE: JOINT PRETRIAL STATEMENT 185 186 187 . Parties are directed to file an amended Joint Pretrial Statement by 4/27/2018; The parties are further directed to provide the Court, no later than 4/27/2018, with electronic copies of the dis puted exhibits so that the Court may evaluate their admissibility, to the extent possible, before trial; In light of the excessive number of pretrial issues that remain unresolved, the Court hereby schedules a second day on which to continue the Pretrial Conference, if it becomes necessary, for May 10, 2018, at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (PM)
|
|
Filing
179
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' AND DEFENDANTS' DAUBERT MOTIONS re: 146 150 , 151 , 154 , 156 , 157 and 158 . Furthermore, having reviewed the proposed content of witness Ian Smith as presented in plaintiffs' briefing, the Court is of the opinion that his testimony would best be proffered in written format not to exceed 20 pages. Any reply should not exceed 20 pages. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (PM) (PM)
|
|
Filing
145
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. Bench Trial (10 Days) is continued to 5/14/2018-5/25/2018 before Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. Daubert motions due 8/25/2017 and noted for 9/15/2017, Daubert Responses due 9/11/2017, Daubert Reply briefs due 9/15/2017, Plaintiffs Pretrial Statement due by 1/31/2018, Defendants Pretrial Statement due by 2/28/2018, Motions in Limine due by 4/3/2018, Conference of Attorneys per LCR 16(k) completed by 4/4/2018, Final Joint Pretrial Order due by 4/13/2018 Final Pretrial Conference is 5/4/2018. (PM)
|
|
Filing
132
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 72 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Plaintiffs' 74 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying Plaintiff-Intervenor's 77 Motion for Order Regarding Government Services. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (RM)
|
|
Filing
131
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 72 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Plaintiffs' 74 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying Plaintiff-Intervenor's 77 Motion for Order Regarding Government Services. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (PM)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting 44 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein.(HR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
