Supercell Oy v. Rothschild Digital Media Innovations, LLC
Plaintiff: Supercell Oy
Defendant: Rothschild Digital Media Innovations, LLC
Case Number: 2:2015cv01119
Filed: July 13, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: King
Presiding Judge: James L. Robart
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 57 STIPULATION AND ORDER dismissing case with prejudice and without an award of costs or fees to any party. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
June 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The court ORDERS the parties to show cause no later than Tuesday, June 12, 2018, why the court should not lift the stay in this matter. In addition, the court directs the parties to propose a course of action for resolving the case in the event the court lifts the stay. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (TH)
March 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER CONTINUING STAY and directing RDMI to file status report no later thanninety (90) days from the entry of this order and to file a status report every ninety (90) days until the court lifts the stay. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
March 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER signed by Judge James L. Robart. In light of the Federal Circuit's judgment, the court ORDERS the parties to file proposals, either jointly or separately, within seven (7) days of the date this order recommending how the court should proceed with this matter. (PM)
November 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER directing that the stay in this case remain in effect until the court orders otherwise. Deft Defendant Rothschild Digital Media Innovations, LLC. to file a status report within ninety (90) days of this order and to file a status report every ninety (90) days until the court lifts the stay. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
July 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER continuing stay and directing Defendant to file a status report in 90 days from this order and every 90 days until the stay is lifted. If matter is resolved, Defendant to file status report within 5 days. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
April 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER continuing stay in this case and directing RDMI to file a status report no more than ninety (90) days from the entry of this order and to file a status report every ninety (90) days until the court lifts the stay. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
January 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER by Judge James L. Robart continuing stay; RDMI to file a status report no more than 90 days from this order and every 90 days until the court lifts the stay. If this matter is resolved or there is any other significant change in the status of this matter any time before ninety (90) days from the date of this order or any 90-day interval at which RDMI must file a status report, the court ORDERS RDMI to file a status report informing the court of the development no more than five (5) days after it occurs. (PM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Supercell Oy v. Rothschild Digital Media Innovations, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Supercell Oy
Represented By: Bryan A Kohm(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Michael J Sacksteder(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Represented By: Jeffrey A. Ware
Represented By: Lauren E Whittemore(Designation Admission Pro Hac Vice)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rothschild Digital Media Innovations, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?