Calvert v. Fessenden

Calvert v. Fessenden

Plaintiff:	Mark Calvert
Defendant:	Beau R Fessenden
Case Number:	2:2015cv01253
Filed:	August 10, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office:	Seattle Office
County:	King
Presiding Judge:	John C Coughenour
Nature of Suit:	Bankruptcy Withdrawal
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 18, 2020	Filing 18 ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT: Judgment Debtor: BEAU FESSENDEN, individually and his marital community Judgment Creditor: ELLIOTT BAY LENDER, LLC c/o Arnold M. Willig, Esq. HACKER & WILLIG, INC., P.S. 520 Pike Street, Suite 2500 Seattle, WA 98101 Judgment Amount: $97,155.38 (as of April 26, 2020) Pre-Judgment Interest: $4,797.55 (award of $92,357.83 on November 21, 2019, to April 26, 2020, at 12% per annum) Post-Judgment Interest: 12% per annum from date of entry until paid in full Attorney Fees and Costs: All attorney fees and costs accruing after November 21, 2019. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (MW)
June 12, 2018	Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER re parties' 10 Notice of Settlement. The Court understands that terms of a final settlement were reached, but the settlement is dependent upon the sale of real estate, which remains pending. Accordingly, the Court refers these matters to the Bankruptcy Court for a Report and Recommendation. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 18, 2020

Filing 18 ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT: Judgment Debtor: BEAU FESSENDEN, individually and his marital community Judgment Creditor: ELLIOTT BAY LENDER, LLC c/o Arnold M. Willig, Esq. HACKER & WILLIG, INC., P.S. 520 Pike Street, Suite 2500 Seattle, WA 98101 Judgment Amount: $97,155.38 (as of April 26, 2020) Pre-Judgment Interest: $4,797.55 (award of $92,357.83 on November 21, 2019, to April 26, 2020, at 12% per annum) Post-Judgment Interest: 12% per annum from date of entry until paid in full Attorney Fees and Costs: All attorney fees and costs accruing after November 21, 2019. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (MW)

June 12, 2018

Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER re parties' 10 Notice of Settlement. The Court understands that terms of a final settlement were reached, but the settlement is dependent upon the sale of real estate, which remains pending. Accordingly, the Court refers these matters to the Bankruptcy Court for a Report and Recommendation. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Calvert v. Fessenden
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Calvert
Represented By:	John Stuart Kaplan
Represented By:	Jane Pearson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Beau R Fessenden
Represented By:	Lawrence Ronald Cock
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?