Madhavapeddi
Plaintiff: Shreedhar Madhavapeddi
Claimant: Kathleen Anne Larsen
Case Number: 2:2015cv01559
Filed: September 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: King
Presiding Judge: Robert S. Lasnik
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 46 U.S.C. ยง 183
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING DEPOSIT OF SECURITY FOR COSTS, ENJOINING ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS SUBJECT TO LIMITATION IN THIS ACTION, AND PROVIDING NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (AD) cc: claimants Protz and Larsen via USPS, Financial
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Madhavapeddi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shreedhar Madhavapeddi
Represented By: Emilia L Sweeney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Kathleen Anne Larsen
Represented By: Ann Heacox Rosato
Represented By: Michael Simon Wampold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?