WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. v. iValue InfoSolutions Pvt. Ltd.
| WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. |
| iValue InfoSolutions Pvt. Ltd. |
| 2:2015cv01697 |
| October 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER GRANTING 66 STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. (AE)
|
|
Filing
65
THIRD AMENDED ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL SCHEDULE by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. Pursuant to the parties 64 Third Stipulation to Adjust Case Schedule, the Court amends the pretrial schedule as follows: Report of Expert Witnesses under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 2/19/2018, All Motions related to discovery due by 2/23/2018. All other case dates remain unchanged. (AE)
|
|
Filing
61
AMENDED ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL SCHEDULE signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida.Pursuant to the parties 60 Stipulated Motion to Adjust Case Schedule, the Court amends the pretrial schedule as follows: Reports of expert witnesses under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 1/29/2018. (AE)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER GRANTING 58 Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. Effective immediately, David H. Binney and the Law Office of David H. Binney is granted permission to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff WatchGuard Technologies, Inc., and Lawrence C. Locker and Summit Law Group PLLC,... is substituted as counsel for Plaintiff WatchGuard Technologies, Inc.(AE)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE PARTIES' 26 31 34 39 47 MOTIONS TO SEAL signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. (TF)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. The Court has been tasked with determining whether both parties' signatures are necessary to effectuate the settlement agreement. In short, the issue put to the Court is essentially one of contract formation. The parties are thus entitled to an evidentiary hearing. The Court therefore ORDERS:1. The parties shall each advise the Court on the record no later than August 3, 2017 whether they wish to request an evidentiary hearing, or prefer that the Court draw all necessary factual conclusions based on the evidentiary record to date; and 2. No later than August 3, 2017, the parties shall propose a stipulated amended case management schedule for all remaining pretrial a nd trial dates, including the discovery completion date of July 31, 2017. See Dkts. 25 , 38 .3. The Court RESERVES ruling on the parties motions to seal until the time it rules on the pending Motion to Enforce Settlement. The parties are cautioned the Court is inclined to preserve the public right to access any court records associated with any evidentiary hearing.(AE)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. v. iValue InfoSolutions Pvt. Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | David H Binney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: iValue InfoSolutions Pvt. Ltd. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
