Pascual v. Zirx Consumer Services, Inc
||Zirx Consumer Services, Inc
||December 8, 2015
||US District Court for the Western District of Washington
||John C Coughenour
|Nature of Suit:
||Fair Labor Standards Act
|Cause of Action:
||29 U.S.C. § 201
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 22, 2017
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 40 Motion for Approval of Class-Action Settlement and for Approval of Attorney's Fees, Costs, and Incentive Award, signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez for Judge John C Coughenour. (SWT)
|August 7, 2017
MINUTE ORDER - Due to the Court's schedule, the upcoming class action settlement fairness hearing shall now be presided over by the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez, United States District Judge, in Courtroom 13206. Accordingly, the motion for final approval (Dkt. No. 40 ) is hereby REFERRED to Judge Martinez. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (PM)
|April 25, 2017
ORDER granting 35 stipulated motion for certification for settlement purposes, preliminary approval of class action settlement, authorization of notice, and a fairness hearing. Fairness Hearing set for 8/22/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1 6206 before U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. Class Members shall have until 45 calendar days after the Settlement Administrator first sends Notice Packets-extended by the periods set forth in the Settlement-to submit to the Court any objections and notices of intention to appear at the fairness hearing. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (PM)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?