Ruiz v. Snohomish County Sheriff's Office Corrections Bureau
Plaintiff: Raymond Brian Ruiz
Defendant: Lewis
Case Number: 2:2016cv00023
Filed: January 6, 2016
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
County: Snohomish
Presiding Judge: Richard A Jones
Presiding Judge: Mary Alice Theiler
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones adopting the 28 Report and Recommendation. Defendant Lewis's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 23 ) is granted. (PM) cc: plaintiff via the U.S. Mail
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ruiz v. Snohomish County Sheriff's Office Corrections Bureau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond Brian Ruiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lewis
Represented By: Katherine H Bosch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?