Reverse Now VII, LLC v. Oregon Mutual Insurance Company
Reverse Now VII, LLC |
Oregon Mutual Insurance Company |
2:2016cv00209 |
February 11, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
Brian A Tsuchida |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 129 MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 128 Stipulated Motion to Withdraw Defendant OMI Co's Pending Motions. The parties are directed to file a Notice of Settlement within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. Authorized by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (TH) |
Filing 106 ORDER granting Defendant's 84 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying Plaintiff's 86 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM) |
Filing 101 MINUTE ORDER denying Defendant's 100 Motion for Leave to File Over-length Motions and Briefs. Authorized by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM) |
Filing 95 ORDER granting in part and denying in part re Plaintiff's 57 MOTION to Compel. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM) |
Filing 83 MINUTE ORDER re: parties' 82 Stipulated Joint MOTION to Extend Trial Days. The Parties are advised that the length of the trial will be set at the pre-trial conference on October 5, 2018. Authorized by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM) |
Filing 79 ORDER granting defendant's 57 Motion to Compel; Plaintiff is ORDERED to comply within seven (7) days of date of this Order. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SWT) |
Filing 78 ORDER granting Plaintiff's 77 Motion to Extend Discovery to May 25, 2018, to allow Mr. Hartman's deposition to take pace on May 25, 2018. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM) |
Filing 73 ORDER granting Defendant's 54 Motion for Leave to Amend Answer. Amended Answer due within 5 days of this order. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM) |
Filing 65 MINUTE ORDER denying Defendant's 59 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages in Response to Defendant's 54 Motion for Leave to Amend. The Court STRIKES Plaintiff's over-length Response (Dkt. No. 60 ). Plaintiff is ORDERED to file an Amended Response that complies with the page limits within one (1) day of the date of this Order. Once Plaintiff has filed its Amended Response, Defendant shall have five (5) days to file its Reply. Authorized by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (TH) |
Filing 53 ORDER granting Plaintiff's 47 Motion for Extension of Time for Expert Witness Disclosure. Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 4/16/2018, Discovery Motions due by 4/27/2018. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM) |
Filing 51 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM) |
Filing 46 ORDER denying Defendant's 44 Motion for Reconsideration, signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (SWT) |
Filing 43 ORDER re: Defendant's 22 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to alleged violations of WAC 284-30-330(3) and (8), WAC 284-30-370, and WAC 284-30-380(4) and (7). The Court DENI ES Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to alleged violations of the IFCA, bad faith, and violations of WAC 284-30-330(6), (7) and (18). The case will proceed to trial on each of these remaining claims. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM) |
Filing 40 ORDER granting Plaintiff's 19 Motion for Leave to Amend. Plaintiff to file Amended Complaint within 10 days of this order. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM) |
Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 17 Stipulated Motion to Continue Trial Date and Related Deadlines : Jury Trial is set for 5/29/2018 (3 days) ; Amended Pleadings due by 9/7/2017, Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 1 0/27/2017, Motions due by 11/30/2017, Discovery completed by 1/26/2018, Dispositive motions due by 2/8/2018, Motions in Limine due by 4/26/2018, Agreed Pretrial Order due by 5/11/2018, Trial briefs/Proposed voir dire/jury instructions due by 5/11/2018, Pretrial Conference set for 5/18/2018 at 01:30 PM. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT) |
Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 15 Stipulated Motion to Extend Case Schedule Deadlines and Trial Date. Deadlines CONTINUED as follows: Amended Pleadings due by 6/15/2017, Discovery completed by 9/29/2017, Dispositive motions due by 10/19/2017, Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 7/3/2017, Motions due by 8/24/2017, Motions in Limine due by 12/26/2017, Pretrial Order due by 1/12/2018, Voir dire/jury instructions/trial briefs due by 1/12/2018, Pretrial Conference set for 1/19/2018 at 01:30 PM. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(SWT) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Reverse Now VII, LLC v. Oregon Mutual Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Reverse Now VII, LLC | |
Represented By: | Clinton Lee Tapper |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Oregon Mutual Insurance Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.