Rische v United States
Jeffrey Alan Rische |
United States, United States Treasury Department and United States Internal Revenue Service |
2:2016cv00339 |
March 7, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
Robert S. Lasnik |
Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7422 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER granting Government's 30 Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying Plaintiff's 31 Motion for Summary Judgment, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) |
Filing 40 AMENDED ORDER Granting Joint 38 Motion For Continuance, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. The trial date and related pretrial filing deadlines are continued until resolution of the parties' motions for summary judgment. The Court will issue a revised scheduling order in the future if it's necessary.(SWT) |
Filing 39 ORDER Granting Joint 38 Motion For Continuance, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. The trial date and related pretrial filing deadlines are continued until resolution of the parties' motions for summary judgment. The Court will issue a revised scheduling order in the future if it's necessary. (KERR) |
Filing 34 ORDER GRANTING PLAINITIFF'S 33 UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DEADLINE, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. Plaintiff's 31 MOTION for Summary Judgment , and defendant's 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment are RENOTED for 3/3/2017. (KERR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.