Kumar v. Convenience Retailers LLC et al
| Raj Kumar |
| Convenience Retailers LLC and Eagle Canyon Capital, LLC |
| 2:2016cv00364 |
| March 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
Agreed PRETRIAL ORDER by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
37
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TRIAL-RELATED DEADLINES. The deadline to file trial briefs, proposed voir dire questions, proposed juryinstructions and to submit trial exhibits to the Court is extended from November 1, 2017 to November 8, 2017. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (TH)
|
|
Filing
35
MINUTE ORDER - The above referenced case is reassigned to the Honorable James L. Robart. The trial will commence on November 15, 2017. Counsel should contact Ashleigh Drecktrah, In-Court Deputy to the Honorable James L. Robart at 206-370-8520, upon receipt of this order. All future pleadings filed in this case shall bear case number C16-364JLR. (KERR)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (RS)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER re parties' 18 Stipulated Motion; Attorneys Loyd Willaford and Sarah E. Derry for Plaintiff Raj Kumar added; Attorney Jie Woo Kim and Patrick Leo McGuigan terminated; by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
