Herbert v. King County et al
| Anthony G. Herbert |
| King County, Fasen, Michael Woodbury and Ferreiro |
| 2:2016cv00380 |
| March 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Brian A Tsuchida |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 60 Motion/Request for written facts and findings from District Court, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 55 Objections to Report and Recommendation, 54 Report and Recommendations ; granting defendants' 31 Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying plaintiff's 51 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment ; plaintiff's claims against the defendants are dismissed with prejudice, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 49 Motion to Clarify; RE-NOTING Defendants' 31 MOTION for Summary Judgment: Noting Date 4/21/2017, by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Overruling Plaintiff's 27 Objections, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (cc: Plaintiff via U.S. Mail) (KERR)
|
|
Filing
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT CPT. MICHAEL WOODBURY, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (cc: Plaintiff via U.S. Mail) (KERR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
